Political Violence and Terrorism Cover in Kenya

There is a specific conversation I have had more than once, and it always goes the same way.
A business owner has a fire policy. He has added riot, strike and civil commotion, because someone once told him to. He believes, reasonably, that he is covered if things turn ugly.
Then we read his exclusions together, and he goes quiet.
Political violence and terrorism sit outside standard property insurance in Kenya. Not buried in small print — excluded outright, on purpose, by every insurer. And the riot extension most people rely on does not reach far enough to close the gap.
Table of Contents
- Why It Is Excluded in the First Place
- RSCC Is Not the Same Thing
- What PVT Cover Actually Includes
- Timing Decides Whether You Can Buy It
- Who Should Actually Consider It
- Practical Steps
- The Bottom Line
- Next Steps
Why It Is Excluded in the First Place
Insurance works by pooling risks that are independent of each other. Your shop burning down tells us nothing about whether your neighbour's will.
Political violence breaks that assumption completely. It hits many businesses in the same area, at the same time, for the same reason. Losses that should be scattered arrive all at once, which is exactly the shape of risk that ordinary property insurance is not built to absorb.
So insurers carve it out of the standard policy and write it separately, under different terms and with capacity arranged specifically for it. That is not insurers avoiding the risk. It is the only structure under which the risk can be carried at all.

RSCC Is Not the Same Thing
This is the misunderstanding that costs money.
Riot, strike and civil commotion cover, added to a fire policy, responds to damage from disturbances of a broadly industrial or public-order character: a strike that turns destructive, a crowd that gets out of hand.
Where it stops is at motive. Once damage is caused by violence with a political purpose — or by an act intended to influence a government or intimidate the public, which is roughly how terrorism is defined in policy wordings — the RSCC extension typically falls away and the political violence exclusion takes over.
From inside a wrecked building the two look identical. Contractually they are not, and the determination of which one applies is made afterwards, by people reading reports rather than standing in your shop.
| Event | Standard fire policy | With RSCC | With PVT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accidental fire | Covered | Covered | Covered |
| Strike turns destructive | Excluded | Covered | Covered |
| Politically motivated unrest | Excluded | Generally excluded | Covered |
| Terrorist act | Excluded | Excluded | Covered |

What PVT Cover Actually Includes
Political violence and terrorism policies are written in layers, and you do not have to take all of them. Typical components:
- Terrorism and sabotage — the core cover
- Riot, strike, civil commotion and malicious damage, where you want it consolidated rather than sitting on the fire policy
- Political violence proper — insurrection, rebellion, revolution, civil war
- Business interruption following an insured event
- Denial of access, where your premises are undamaged but unusable because the area is cordoned off
That last one is worth pausing on. In an urban incident, far more businesses lose trade to a police cordon than lose property to the incident itself. A physical-damage-only policy pays those businesses nothing, because nothing of theirs was damaged. Denial of access is the extension that responds, and it is routinely left off.

Timing Decides Whether You Can Buy It
Here is the practical point that matters more than any coverage detail.
PVT capacity is anticipatory. When the market expects elevated risk in a period ahead, three things happen, usually together:
- Rates rise.
- Terms tighten — higher deductibles, narrower wordings, lower limits.
- Capacity is withdrawn for certain locations and trades altogether.
Insurance is priced on uncertainty. Once a risk stops being uncertain and starts being expected, it stops being insurable at a sensible price, and eventually stops being insurable at all.
The consequence is blunt: you cannot buy this cover when you have decided you need it. The moment your need becomes obvious to you, it is equally obvious to every underwriter in the market. Businesses that hold PVT cover through the quiet periods are the ones that have it in the loud ones.
If your planning horizon includes any period of elevated political risk, the decision belongs several quarters ahead of it, not several weeks.

Who Should Actually Consider It
Not every business needs this. Honest assessment beats blanket advice:
Strong case:
- Premises on or near major roads, junctions and routes that gatherings use
- Retail with street frontage, particularly in town centres
- Businesses with significant stock or fit-out that cannot be moved quickly
- Anyone with a lease or loan that obliges them to insure the premises fully
- Businesses that could not survive several months of closure
- Owners who are not in the country. A house or rental block built from abroad is the clearest case of all: nobody can move stock, board up a frontage or argue with anyone on the day, and the asset is usually the single biggest thing the family owns.
Weaker case:
- Premises inside secured compounds well away from public routes
- Service businesses whose assets are laptops and people, who can work elsewhere
- Anyone whose realistic maximum loss is small enough to fund from reserves
If you are building or letting property in Kenya while living abroad, run the question differently: if this were damaged while you were 7,000km away, who would handle it, and what would you be able to prove? Distance does not change what the policy pays. It changes how long everything takes, and it removes every informal option a local owner still has.
The question that cuts through it: if this building were unusable for six months, would the business still exist? If the answer is no, the exposure is not really about property. It is about survival, and business interruption is the section that matters most.

Practical Steps
- Read your exclusions. Find the political violence and terrorism exclusion in your current policy. It is there. Knowing it exists is most of the work.
- Check whether you hold RSCC, and do not mistake it for PVT.
- Ask about denial of access specifically, not just physical damage.
- Work out your indemnity period honestly — how long until you would be trading normally again.
- Get an indication early. Asking what it costs commits you to nothing, and the answer is far more useful before the market tightens than after.
The Bottom Line
| Belief | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Property insurance covers civil unrest" | It excludes political violence and terrorism outright |
| "I have riot cover, so I'm fine" | RSCC stops where political motive begins |
| "I'll buy it if things look risky" | That is when terms tighten and capacity leaves |
| "Only damaged businesses lose money" | Denial of access closes undamaged ones too |
| "It's for big corporates" | It is priced on your sum insured, like any property cover |
Most businesses will never claim on this cover, and that is exactly the point. It is bought for the year it is needed, in the years it is not.
Next Steps
- Locate the political violence exclusion in your existing policy this week.
- List what six months of closure would cost you, not just what the building is worth.
- Ask for an indication now, while terms are ordinary.
- Read: Property Insurance in Kenya: What It Actually Covers
- Read: Commercial Property Insurance
- Building or letting from abroad? Read: Insurance for Kenyans Abroad
Ready to Get Started?
Get personalized advice and quotes tailored to your needs. No pressure, just honest guidance.
👉 Or start a chat with our assistant now.